The value from acquiring and divesting a joint venture: a real options approach

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Real Options in Management and Organizational Strategy: A Review of Decision‐making and Performance Implications (2012, unknown): “Therefore, corporate performance is a function of the Kumar 2005).”
Sunk Costs, Uncertainty and Market Exit: A Real Options Perspective (2009, background): “In particular, while existing evidence suggests that both uncertainty (Harrigan, 1981) and sunk costs (Porter, 1976) influence exit, and that stock markets value the real options associated with termination decisions (Berger et al., 1996; Kumar, 2005), we lack empirical evidence demonstrating that t”
Performance of International Joint Ventures: What Factors Really Make a Difference and How? (2009, background): “In addition, IJV termination may actually signal its success because IJVs may be terminated once participants have successfully accomplished their initial objectives (Gomes-Casseres, 1987; Kumar, 2005).”
The danger of misinterpreting short-window event study findings in strategic management research: an empirical illustration using horizontal acquisitions (2008, background): “…to a corporate event announcement as the ‘value’ or ‘wealth’ created by the event, rather than the market’s evaluation of the value it is expected to create (e.g. Capron and Pistre, 2002; Kumar, 2005; Merchant and Schendel, 2000; Reuer and Miller, 1997; Shelton, 1988; Shen and Canella, 2003).”