Literacy and the Processing of Oral Recasts in SLA.

By Martha Bigelow, R. delMas, Kit Hansen, E. Tarone. 2006

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81003ccdc1b929e2ff91b20a4995c38a4d081a21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Kazuya Saito
2. R. Lyster
3. Masatoshi Sato

In Language and Linguistics

1. Masatoshi Sato
2. Kazuya Saito
3. R. Lyster
4. K. Rajagopalan
5. Hossein Nassaji
6. S. Loewen
7. Luke Plonsky
8. R. Ellis

Citations in the corpus

• Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms (2012, background): “For example, the positive effects for recasts are reserved for learners with high literacy levels (Bigelow et al. 2006), developmental readiness (Mackey & Philp 1998), high working memory capacity (Mackey et al.”
• Sampling Bias and the Problem of Generalizability in Applied Linguistics (2020, unknown): “Sixteen years later, this situation remains largely unchanged (but see Bigelow, Delmas, Hansen, & Tarone, 2006).”