Reward‐Related Responses in the Human Striatum

By Mauricio R. Delgado. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2007

781 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80e522c62eecc8c722aa2fa5f55f1c47fc026600

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry (2011, positive): “Regions in this brain pathway (especially the NAcc), which is implicated in the valuation and prediction of potential rewards (Breiter & Rosen, 1999; Delgado, 2007; O’Doherty, 2004; Schultz, 2010), have been found in several recent functional neuroimaging studies to show especially heightened activa”
Neurobiology of the Adolescent Brain and Behavior (2010, positive): “Seminal animal and human works have shown how striatal and prefrontal cortical regions shape goal-directed behavior.(7,28,38,39,45) Using single-unit recordings in monkeys, Pasupathy and Miller(46) demonstrated that when flexibly learning a set of reward contingencies, very early activity in the str”
Functional magnetic resonance imaging in consumer research: A review and application (2011, background): “1002/mar 620 its subareas in (1) goal-directed evaluation of affective stimuli (Delgado, 2007), especially in reward-related learning (Cohen et al.”
Human Reinforcement Learning Subdivides Structured Action Spaces by Learning Effector-Specific Values (2009, methodology): “In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), correlates of value and PE have often been observed in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and striatum (Pagnoni et al., 2002; McClure et al., 2003; O’Doherty et al., 2003; Daw et al., 2006a; Delgado, 2007; Scho¨nberg et al., 2007; Hare et al., 2008).”
Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation (2010, positive): “Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of the striatum in the goal-directed evaluation of affective stimuli (Delgado, 2007) and the coding of deviations of actual rewards from expectations (Knutson & Wimmer, 2007).”
The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value (2013, neutral): “…decision-making tasks, comparing BOLD response amplitudes across outcomes or prospects that differ in SV. Qualitative reviews of this work (e.g., Delgado, 2007; Grabenhorst and Rolls, 2011; Kable and Glimcher, 2009; Knutson and Cooper, 2005; Levy and Glimcher, 2012; Montague and Berns, 2002;…”
Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business (2010, background): “Many studies have shown that striatal activity correlates with hedonic rating scale”
The role of the nucleus accumbens and rostral anterior cingulate cortex in anhedonia: Integration of resting EEG, fMRI, and volumetric techniques (2009, background): “Because striatal responses have been found to be maximal when rewards are unpredictable (e.g., Delgado, 2007; O'Doherty et al., 2004), the current design might have increased our ability to identify lawful associations between NAcc responses to gains and anhedonia in this psychiatrically healthy s”
Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanised perception (2009, background): “…engaged in tracking reward and punishment value especially activate to social stimuli as well (Harris, 2007); these regions include orbital and medial frontal regions, amygdala, insula, and striatum, including nucleus accumbens, caudate, putamen, and globus pallidum (Delgado, 2007, see Figure 1).”
Depression, Stress, and Anhedonia: Toward a Synthesis and Integrated Model (2014, background): “When seen in the framework of prior studies (e.g., Delgado 2007, O’Doherty et al. 2004, Wrase et al. 2007), these findings highlight neural patterns pointing to impaired hedonic coding (NAc), reward-related learning (caudate), and reward prediction (putamen) in MDD. Direct evidence of neural…”
Neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary risk taking in the human brain: An fMRI Study of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) (2008, background): “…dopamine rich mesolimbic regions including the midbrain, striatum, and their reciprocally connected frontal cortex, have been suggested to play a particular role in processing reward or motivational stimulus salience during decision-making (Bozarth, 1991; Schultz et al., 1997; Delgado, 2007).”
Developmental neurobiology of cognitive control and motivational systems. (2010, background): “Two key regions implicated in cognitive and motivational behavior are the prefrontal cortex known to be important for cognitive control [13], and the striatum critical in detecting and learning about novel and rewarding cues in the environment [14].”
The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy (2009, positive): “As reviewed elsewhere, dozens of studies have demonstrated reward responses in these regions that are consistent with tracking forecasted or experienced value, which might play a role in value learning (Delgado, 2007; Knutson and Cooper, 2005; O’Doherty, 2004).”
A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. (2010, background): “The NAcc contributes to decision-making behavior by signaling the anticipation and attainment of rewards, and serves to influence motivated behavior via connections with the prefrontal cortex (Cardinal, Parkinson, Hall, & Everitt, 2002; Delgado, 2007; Schultz, 2006).”