A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues.

By Leah H. Somerville, Rebecca M. Jones, B. Casey. Brain and Cognition, 2010

989 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47d95f2b7bb51d91d3d983017599dda190409bb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Behavioral Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The effects of poor quality sleep on brain function and risk taking in adolescence (2013, positive): “Dual system theories of adolescent neurodevelopment posit that risk taking increases during adolescence due to a competition between two neural systems— the affective system, which is involved in reward sensitivity, and the cognitive control system, which is involved in cognitive regulation (Somervi”
Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood (2014, background): “Whether this is associated with parallel hormonal changes or changes in brain functioning (Somerville et al., 2010) needs further examination.”
Personality and Risk Taking (2015, background): “…bottom-up affective – motivational processes versus still immature (prefrontal) top-down cognitive control processes (Gladwin et al., 2011; Somerville et al., 2010; see also Blakemore and Robbins, 2012; Crone and Dahl, 2012; Ernst and Fudge, 2009; Steinberg, 2010; Reyna and Farley,…”
The Impact of Internet Pornography on Adolescents: A Review of the Research (2012, background): “A constellation of significant change occurs during adolescence and many of these changes are influenced by rewards (Somerville et al., 2010).”
The Development of Impulse Control and Sensation‐Seeking in Adolescence: Independent or Interdependent Processes? (2016, background): “Although Figure 1 depicts the development of the incentive-processing system as plateauing, evidence reviewed by Somerville et al. (2010) indicates that the responsiveness of the incentive-processing system actually declines after mid-adolescence.”
The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration (2017, positive): “At the same time, the specific ways in which the teenage brain remains immature, particularly the less developed circuits of the prefrontal cortex relative to other brain areas, contribute to the propensity of adolescents to engage in impulsive behaviors and to take risks (Somerville et al., 2010).”