Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanised perception

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stepmothers are mean and academics are pretentious: What do pretrained language models learn about you? (2021, unknown): “Previous works show that groups evoke different emotional proﬁles (Cottrell and Neuberg, 2005; Tapias et al., 2007; Mackie et al., 2000), and a variety of theories link particular intergroup relations to distinct stereotype-driven emotions such as disgust and anger (Harris and Fiske, 2006, 2009).”
The Emotional Cost of Humanity (2016, background): “Although dehumanization of stigmatized out-groups has been well documented in social psychology (for review, see Harris & Fiske, 2009), anticipated exhaustion has not been examined as a motivational process underpinning this effect.”
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup (2012, background): “That these groups are especially dehumanised has been shown most dramatically by Harris and Fiske (2006, 2009).”
GROUPS AND MORALITY (2014, background): “Except when an out-group is so disliked, or so unimportant, that it is ignored (see Harris & Fiske, 2009), people should have great interest in an outgroup’s morality (see also Chapter 11, this volume).”