Links between social information processing in middle childhood and involvement in bullying
By M. Camodeca, F. Goossens, C. Schuengel, M. M. Terwogt. 2003
160 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80b51451f9e92437eb69f0baa9ebe64334ac1114
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Education
- Tanya N. Beran
- Qing Li
- F. Goossens
- M. Camodeca
- Bonnie J. Leadbeater
- Robert S. Tokunaga
- Christopher P. Barlett
- Özgür Erdur-Baker
In Social Psychology
- F. Goossens
- M. Camodeca
- Tanya N. Beran
- Qing Li
- Rachel S. Yeung
- Bonnie J. Leadbeater
- Robert S. Tokunaga
- Christopher P. Barlett
Citations in the corpus
- The Relationship between Cyberbullying and School Bullying (2008, background): “In addition to these internalising behaviours, children who are bullied may display externalising problems such as impulsiveness and hyperactivity (Camodeca et al., 2003; Johnson et al., 2002).”
- Children's opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: the importance of bullying role and perspective (2005, background): “We may suppose that when children are offered various opportunities, they choose the ones that are more prosocial and adequate (cf. Rudolph & Heller, 1997; Camodeca et al., 2003), who claimed that responses”
- Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents (2008, unknown): “23,24 In a bullying situation, aggressive victims display their emotions in a way that perpetuates provocation.”
- Does Hostile Attributional Bias for Relational Provocations Mediate the Short-Term Association between Relational Victimization and Aggression in Preadolescence? (2007, background): “Past research has shown that compared to low aggressive children, physically aggressive children report more hostile attributional biases in their responses to hypothetical situations involving ambiguous physical provocations and that these in turn are associated with condoning aggressive or punitiv”