Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents

By Tolga Aricak, Sinem Siyahhan, Aysegul Uzunhasanoglu, Sevda Saribeyoglu, Songul Ciplak, N. Yilmaz, Cemil Memmedov. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2008

453 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4525c555b32efe9d08bcf5258742953fdf3beeed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “has been through different ways of technically protecting oneself from harassment online (Aricak et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2008).”
Cyberbullying Prevalence, Stability, and Risk Factors During Adolescence (2013, background): “…frequent access to the necessary media (i.e., cell phone and/or Internet) likely places adolescents at increased risk for cyberbullying others (Aricak et al., 2008; Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Ybarra, 2004; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2004a), as does involvement in other forms of antisocial behaviors.”
Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: una revisión (2011, unknown): “Aricak et al. (2008) Turquía 269 secundaria 35,7% acosadores, 23,8% víctima-agresor, 5,9% víctimas.”
Psychiatric Symptomatology as a Predictor of Cyberbullying among University Students (2009, result): “This is quite possibly an explanation for the frequent finding in previous literature that has left unanswered the question as to why bully-victims exist in greater numbers in previous studies than pure-bullies or pure-victims (Arıcak et al., 2008; Li, 2006; 2007).”
Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. (2013, background): “Understanding the possible consequences of both traditional bullying and cyberbullying is important so that interventions and school policies can be designed to most effectively help both victims and perpetrators [4,48].”
Cyberbullying among adolescents: Measures in search of a construct. (2014, unknown): “…be aggressive, such as gossiping (e.g., DeHue, Bolman, & Vollink, 2008; Nicol & Fleming, 2010; Wright & Li, 2013), playing a joke (e.g., Werner, Bumpus, & Rock, 2010), or generally disinhibited behavior, such as saying something online that they would not say in person (e.g., Aricak et al., 2008).”
Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students (2011, background): “The significant relationship between victimisation and bullying, and differences between males and females with regard to cyberbullying and victimisation could suggest that there was a bullying loop, which was mostly activated by males in contrast with the findings of some studies (Hoff & Mitchell, ”
Effectiveness of coping strategies for victims of cyberbullying (2013, background): “Thus, in line with prior findings (Aricak et al., 2008; Juvonen & Gross, 2008; Price & Dalgleish, 2010), we would encourage the use of this strategy, even more so if we consider that cybervictims are less likely to seek help compared to those victimized in more traditional ways (Dooley, Gradinger, S”
Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims (2009, background): “However, Aricak et al. (2008) only found a positive relationship between the frequency of internet use and certain forms of cyberbullying (i.e. sending infected emails and saying things online that would not be said face-to-face), but not for others (i.e. displaying someone’s picture without…”
Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization (2010, background): “On average, approximately 20–40% of youths report being victimized by a cyberbully (Aricak et al., 2008; Dehue et al., 2008; Hinduja & Patchin, 2008; Li, 2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2008; Patchin & Hinduja, 2006; Smith et al., 2008; Topcu et al., 2008; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2008).”
Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? (2012, methodology): “Many students recommend asking their parents for help in case of a cybervictimisation incident (Aricak et al. 2008; Bhat 2008; Slonje and Smith 2008; Smith et al. 2008; Stacey 2009; Topcu, Erdur-Baker, and Capa-Aydin 2008).”
Cyberbullying in College (2014, background): “Past research in high school students has reported approximately 15% of their samples as self-identified cyberbullies (Aricak et al., 2008; Li, 2007).”