Why Child L2 Acquisition
By Bonnie D Schwartz. 2004
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f981a70427a35b5e550a9b63e94baade5416454
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Specific Language Impairment and Early Second Language Acquisition: The Risk of Over- and Underdiagnosis (2014, background): “The existing studies indicate that, besides chronological age, age of onset and length of exposure influence eL2 children’s language performance (cf. Schwartz 2004; Schulz et al. 2008; Unsworth 2005).”
- Articles, adjectives and age of onset: the acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender (2008, background): “The merit of this three-way comparison is that it potentially allows disentangling effects of age of onset and L1 vs. L2 acquisition (Schwartz, 1992; 2004; Unsworth, 2005).”
- The acquisition of articles in child second language English: fluctuation, transfer or both? (2008, unknown): “…difficulties with a target structure are inherent in the process of learning that structure, rather than stemming from cognitive immaturity (i.e. L1 acquisition), on the one hand, or age-based limitations for native-like attainment (i.e. adult L2 acquisition), on the other (compare Schwartz, 2004).”