Articles, adjectives and age of onset: the acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail? (2014, methodology): “A structure that has frequently been used to test native-like attainment in the L2, is grammatical gender, since it has been shown to pose a major challenge to L2 learners (e.g., Hawkins, 2001; White et al., 2001; Sabourin, 2003; Blom et al., 2008).”
The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch (2011, background): “Assuming that gender agreement is a purely syntactic phenomenon, then from a generativist perspective at least it should not be subject to input effects, at least not to the same extent (but cf. Blom et al., 2008).”
Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender* (2012, methodology): “…similar errors to monolingual children, overgeneralising de with neuter nouns, producing non-target combinations such as deCOMMON huisNEUTER, and overgeneralising the inflected form of the adjective, as in ∗een kleine huis (Blom et al., 2008a; Cornips, van der Hoek & Verwer, 2006; De Houwer, 1990).”
Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change* (2010, background): “Blom et al. (2008), Hulk and Cornips (2006) or Kroffke and Rothweiler (2006), and deliberately leave this question undecided and refer to them as “between 2L1 and child L2”.”