Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies

By David Bradley, E. Huber, Stephanie Moller, F. Nielsen, John Stephens. 2003

762 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7edcf29ea8e93e617398c5b9ead0636a8533fbb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In General Health Professions

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Politics and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean (2006, background): “There is solid empirical evidence that the strength of left parties has a significant effect on the extent of redistribution effected through the welfare state in advanced industrial democracies (Bradley et al. 2003).”
Varieties of Dualization? Labor Market Segmentation and Insider-Outsider Divides Across Regimes (2010, background): “In that sense, continental and Southern welfare states reproduce market inequalities, rather than correcting them (Bradley et al. 2003).”
Welfare regimes and welfare state outcomes in Europe (2012, background): “Bradley et al. (2003) provide comprehensive evidence on the distributive and redistributive processes in modern welfare states.”
Electoral turnout and income redistribution by the state: A cross-national analysis of the developed democracies (2008, methodology): “Of the much smaller number of studies that have focused specifically on redistribution, some (e.g., Bradley et al., 2003) have not considered turnout at all, while in nearly all of the others (e.g., Huber and Stephens, 2001; Crepaz, 2002; Mahler, 2004) turnout has been one of many variables in…”
Why Do Welfare States Persist? (2006, methodology): “Our data set, like many other cross-section time-series data that are generated by merging country-level summaries of survey data with OECD data (Brady 2003; Bradley et al. 2003), has a “wide” structure in which there are more countries than time periods.”
Economic Inequality, Relative Power, and Religiosity* (2011, background): “obvious means by which religiosity might shape the distribution of economic resources—government by religiously-based parties—has been found to have virtually no impact on redistribution in the advanced democracies (Bradley et al., 2003).”
Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence (2016, background): “This hypothesis claims that inequality is positively related to actual redistribution but research on this relationship continuously finds a negative relationship (Moene and Wallerstein, 2001, 2003; Bradley et al., 2003; Iversen and Soskice, 2006).”
Who Gives, Who Gains? Progressivity and Preferences (2016, background): “How should it be measured? One prominent measure in the literature is the redistributive effect taxes and transfers have, which is typically measured as the (proportional) reduction in the gini coefficient comparing market and disposable income distributions (Bradley et al. 2003; Kenworthy and Pontu”
Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies (2004, background): “…mechanism—the United States' Earned Income Tax Credit and the United Kingdom's Working Families Tax Credit being notable examples—it can also be used to claw 5 This argument applies to the debate on income redistribution via the welfare state (Bradley et al. 2003; Kenworthy and Pontusson 2002).”
The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States (2010, background): “In a different vein, Bradley et al. (2003) resolve the Robin Hood paradox by arguing that wage compression and redistributive social spending are both caused by strong unions and Left parties. Iversen and Soskice (2009) offer yet another solution, arguing that coordinated market economies and politi”
School-to-Work Linkages in the United States, Germany, and France1 (2017, background): “The political scientists Bradley et al. (2003) and Busemeyer and Iversen (2012) analyze the impact on inequality of nationallevel institutional features, such as union density, the centralization of collective bargaining, firm involvement in training, or public investment in vocational education.”
Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation (2008, background): “As a result, the Swiss welfare state is the least redistributive of all welfare states, including the liberal ones (Bradley et al., 2003).”
Globalization, labour power and partisan politics revisited (2010, neutral): “See Bradley et al. (2003) and Iversen and Soskice (2006) for studies of partisan effects on redistribution.”