Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence

By Alexander W. Schmidt-Catran. 2016

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cd9dc910e5fc416064b57d348d6d6d97048b273

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Malcolm Fairbrother
2. J. Mijs

In General Health Professions

1. Andrew Bell
2. Malcolm Fairbrother
3. Kelvyn Jones
4. J. Mijs

In Political Science and International Relations

1. J. Mijs
2. Malcolm Fairbrother
3. Andrew Bell
4. Kelvyn Jones
5. Marina Povitkina

Citations in the corpus

• The paradox of inequality: income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand (2019, background): “…I estimate three-level hierarchical linear regression models with random intercepts for country periods and countries to account for the nesting of individuals (Level 1) in country periods (Level 2) and countries (Level 3) (cf. Schmidt-Catran, 2016; and see Schmidt-Catran and Fairbrother, 2016).”
• Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice (2018, background): “…for whole societies: Europeans for example demand more income redistribution from their governments in times of greater inequality—relative to the average for their country—even though people in consistently more unequal countries do not generally demand more redistribution (Schmidt-Catran 2016).”