The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States

By J. Pontusson, David Rueda. 2010

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97a9f00b236311b6c220876610e296c37e2ec37e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. P. Beramendi
2. Sam van Noort
3. G. Underhill
4. Matthijs Rooduijn
5. Brian Burgoon
6. Philipp Rehm
7. A. Johnston
8. Aidan Regan

In Public Administration

1. P. Beramendi
2. Matthijs Rooduijn
3. Brian Burgoon
4. Philipp Rehm
5. Aidan Regan

Citations in the corpus

• Who Gives, Who Gains? Progressivity and Preferences (2016, result): “This intuition is consistent with a recent literature that suggests that increases in income inequality are an important source of political polarization (Iversen & Soskice, 2001, 2015; McCarty, Poole, & Rosenthal, 2006; Pontusson & Rueda, 2010).”
• Positional deprivation and support for radical right and radical left parties* (2018, background): “2005; Lucassen and Lubbers, 2012; Rydgren and Ruth 2013); income inequality (Coffé et al. 2007; Pontusson and Rueda 2010; Han 2016); and aggregate unemployment (Jackman and Volpert 1996; Knigge 1998; Golder 2003; Lubbers et al.”
• Housing prices and wealth inequality in Western Europe (2019, background): “Robust debates in CPE have examined how left-wing governments, strong unions and collaborative wage-setting institutions, progressive taxation, a redistributive welfare state and public sector employment impact on income inequality (Bradley et al. 2003; Card et al. 2004; Kenworthy and Pontusson 2005”