The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection
By Neal Schmitt. 2012
179 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e7a5f8ce10e4c55a78dcd3e999c6767946742e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Robert M. Klassen
- L. Kim
- Andrew Marty
- Simon Albrecht
- Robert E. Ployhart
- Neal Schmitt
- Mallory A. McCord
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Andrew Marty
- Robert E. Ployhart
- Robert M. Klassen
- Neal Schmitt
- Anthony J. Nyberg
- L. Kim
- Simon Albrecht
- D. Zohar
Citations in the corpus
- Personality, self-efficacy and job resources and their associations with employee engagement, affective commitment and turnover intentions (2020, background): “Broad versus narrow personality traits A number of researchers (e.g. Barrick & Mount, 2012; Hough & Oswald, 2008; Paunonen & Jackson, 2000) have suggested that lower-level facets may provide more predictive power than the Five Factor Model (FFM) or Big 6 factors.”
- Selecting teachers and prospective teachers: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “Organizational psychologists design selection systems to answer questions about predictor variables, such as What should be assessed? and How should we assess it? but attention is also paid to assessing a broad range of outcome measures over longer periods of time (Beier & Ackerman, 2012).”
- Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work (2014, background): “See Schmitt 2012, pp. 865–78 Bell ST. 2007.”
- Human Capital Is Dead; Long Live Human Capital Resources! (2014, background): “However, not all individual differences are KSAOs: attitudes, satisfaction, motivation, emotion, and related characteristics are not KSAOs because they are highly variable, more situationally specific, and situationally induced (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Murphy, 2012).”
- Workplace safety (2016, background): “Perhaps the most commonly examined workplace safety indicator is the occurrence of accidents (Wallace et al., 2012), which we define here as workplace events that result in physical harm to persons.”