Beyond Self-interest: A Set of Propositions Relevant to Interpersonal Orientations

By P. V. van Lange. 2000

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d7dee4952214b03d0bd40fc61dcb6748fe724d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Daniel Balliet
3. J. Joireman
4. Eric van Dijk
5. Bogdan Wojciszke
6. David de Cremer
7. Siegwart Lindenberg
8. Joachim I. Krueger

In Social Psychology

1. Eric van Dijk
2. Daniel Balliet
3. P. V. van Lange
4. Bogdan Wojciszke
5. J. Joireman
6. David de Cremer
7. Siegwart Lindenberg
8. Joachim I. Krueger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Daniel Balliet
3. Eric van Dijk
4. J. Joireman
5. Bogdan Wojciszke
6. David de Cremer
7. Siegwart Lindenberg
8. Joachim I. Krueger

Citations in the corpus

• Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining (2004, background): “As Van Lange (2000) even put it: ‘‘one should obtain statistical interactions of disposition-and-situation’’ (p. 319).”
• Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money (2010, unknown): “Social value orientations: Social psychological experiments on the effects of social value orientations on cooperation show that people differ widely in the goals they strive for in situations of interdependence (Van Lange, 2000).”
• From social projection to social behaviour (2007, background): “Van Lange (1999, 2000) proposed that people transform a given payoff matrix into a subjective one by weighting the payoffs for others and the differences between their own and the other’s payoffs.”
• Morality and competence in person- and self-perception (2005, background): “This is because moral acts refer directly to the dimension of other-concern, while competence taps directly the dimension of selfconcern—to borrow terms from social-value orientation theorists (Van Lange, 2000; Van Lange & Kuhlman, 1994).”
• Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes (2006, background): “This phenomenon is by now empirically well established (see Caporael, Dawes, Orbell, and Van de Kragt, 1989; Hogg, 2001; Kollock, 1997; Terry and Hogg, 2001) and quite essential to understanding the power of framing effects.”
• Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination (2012, background): “As in Study 1, participants arrived at the laboratory individually and were initially asked to complete a ‘points allocation game’ (in reality the 9-item triple-dominance measure of SVO, see Van Lange, 1999).”
• Affective Concomitants of Information on Morality and Competence. (2005, background): “Obviously, maximization of self-interest is not the sole principle motivating behavior and social cognition (cf. Van Lange, 2000 ).”
• Social Value Orientation, Expectations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta–Analysis (2018, background): “Similarly, decades of research have shown that SVO reliably predicts cooperation not only in social dilemmas (Balliet et al., 2009) but also across a broad range of natural settings (e.g. Van Lange, 2000; Van Lange, Van Vugt, Meertens, & Ruiter, 1998).”