An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions

By Tamara Dinev, Paul J. Hart. Information systems research, 2006

2,612 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d190dcfa92693474ad9aea40db3c568a55b0bb0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

An Experimental Study on Ubiquitous commerce Adoption: Impact of Personalization and Privacy Concerns (2008, background): “The Online Medicine Cabinet also enables consumers to monitor their vital signs and immediately share this information with their doctors via the Internet.”
Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review (2011, background): “…consumers would perform a risk–benefit analysis to assess the outcomes they would face in return for the information, and respond accordingly (Chellappa and Sin 2005; Culnan 1993; Dinev and Hart 2006; Hann et al. 2008; Hui et al. 2006; Milne and Gordon 1993; Milne and Rohm 2000; Xu et al. 2010).”
Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion (2009, background): “Indeed, recent research underscores the significance of privacy concerns when the Internet is used as a medium for transferring information (Dinev and Hart 2006; Hui et al. 2007; Malhotra et al. 2004), when information is gathered and used in an organizational context (Smith et al. 1996; Stewart…”
The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature review (2017, background): “Furthermore, the cumulative effects of internet trust and personal internet interests can outweigh privacy risk perception to point that it eventually leads to the disclosure of personal information as it pertains to e-commerce transactions for example (Dinev and Hart, 2006).”
Alexa, Are You Listening? (2018, background): “NU05 directly weighed smart speakers’ benefits against privacy risks in a privacy calculus [22]: “I guess for me it’s in terms of the benefits to me using it versus the cost in terms of a perceived loss of privacy.”
Machine Heuristic: When We Trust Computers More than Humans with Our Personal Information (2019, neutral): “[8].”
Information disclosure on mobile devices: Re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior (2013, neutral): “However, privacy calculus is grounded on the premise that decision makers are rational individuals who perceive a linear, utility-based relationship between benefits and risks (Dinev and Hart, 2006).”
Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences (2015, methodology): “Correspondingly, privacy risks are related to the uncertainty caused by the possibility of the misuse of privacy information that can result in loss for the users (Dinev & Hart, 2006a).”
The effects of privacy concerns and personal innovativeness on potential and experienced customers’ adoption of location-based services (2009, background): “Although privacy concerns have been researched extensively in IS (e.g., Dinev and Hart 2006a; Malhotra et al. 2004), its role in the nomological net of UTAUT has not been investigated .”
Research Note - Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions (2013, background): “For example, Dinev and Hart (2006) found that individuals were more willing to provide personal information for Internet transactions when their interests in the content surpassed privacy concerns.”