Machine Heuristic: When We Trust Computers More than Humans with Our Personal Information

By Shyam Sundar, Jinyoung Kim. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2019

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this day and age of identity theft, are we likely to trust machines more than humans for handling our personal information? We answer this question by invoking the concept of "machine heuristic," which is a rule of thumb that machines are more secure and trustworthy than humans. In an experiment (N = 160) that involved making airline reservations, users were more likely to reveal their credit card information to a machine agent than a human agent. We demonstrate that cues on the interface trigger the machine heuristic by showing that those with higher cognitive accessibility of the heuristic (i.e., stronger prior belief in the rule of thumb) were more likely than those with lower accessibility to disclose to a machine, but they did not differ in their disclosure to a human. These findings have implications for design of interface cues conveying machine vs. human sources of our online interactions.

Subfields: Information Systems, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/638b4f6359716abec17512a458c48dacfac5446a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

  1. Umang Bhatt
  2. Javier Antorán
  3. Q. Liao
  4. Adrian Weller

In Safety Research

  1. Umang Bhatt
  2. Javier Antorán
  3. Q. Liao
  4. Alice Xiang
  5. Adrian Weller
  6. Will Sutherland
  7. Prasanna Sattigeri
  8. Yunfeng Zhang

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Q. Liao
  2. Adrian Weller
  3. Will Sutherland
  4. Hua Jiang
  5. Umang Bhatt
  6. Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi
  7. Yang Cheng
  8. Alice Xiang

Citations in the corpus