Examining the Yes/No vocabulary test: some methodological issues in theory and practice

By Renaud Beeckmans, June Eyckmans, Vera Janssens, Michel Dufranne, Hans Van de Velde. 2001

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c435d2ae820cf5de21050365ecb14e6603ba61d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. N. Schmitt
2. A. Pellicer‐Sánchez
3. kira Mochida
4. Michael Harrington
5. Stuart Webb
6. E. Peters
7. Lars Stenius Stæhr
8. Sungmook Choi

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. A. Pellicer‐Sánchez
2. N. Schmitt
3. Michael Harrington
4. kira Mochida
5. Stuart Webb
6. E. Peters
7. Lars Stenius Stæhr
8. Sungmook Choi

Citations in the corpus

• Scoring Yes–No vocabulary tests: Reaction time vs. nonword approaches (2012, background): “The range tends to be from around 25% to 50% nonwords, with recent data obtained by Meara from the Dialang project suggesting that 33% seems to be a good compromise (Beeckmans et al., 2001).”
• The Yes/No test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge (2006, methodology): “In general, the alternative scoring methods examined here – and in Beeckmans et al. (2001) and Huibregtse et al. (2002) – yielded only small differences in outcomes.”