Ambidextrous leadership and employees' self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors

By H. Zacher, Alecia Robinson, Kathrin Rosing. 2016

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7beb93902a597334d75d8a49733b8a5c25efa7d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs (2020, methodology): “Other researchers (such as Alghamdi, 2018; Zacher et al., 2014) have found that OLB positively predicted employee explorative innovation behaviors beyond control variables.”
Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance (2018, background): “Leadership has been considered to be one of the most influential predictors of worker innovation and organizational development (Zacher et al. 2016; Hunter et al. 2011; Bledow et al. 2009).”
Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance (2017, background): “However, a potential problem of self-report data is that employees may have inaccurate views of their innovative performance (Zacher et al., 2016).”
Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership (2019, background): “To support this requirement of ambidexterity, leaders should show both opening behaviors that encourage experimentation, and closing behaviors that focus on monitoring (Rosing et al., 2011; Zacher et al., 2014).”
Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework (2018, unknown): “…as: Uhl-Bien, M., The Leadership Quarterly (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009 et al., 2011; Turner, Swart, and Maylor, 2013; Zacher, Robinson, and Rosing, 2016; Zacher and Rosing, 2015), dynamic capabilities (Chen and Chang, 2013; Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000; Martin, 2011;…”