The relationship between economic development and business ownership revisited
By Martin A. Carree, André van Stel, Roy Thurik, S. Wennekers. 2007
329 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b165303858b33652932cf34bbaa15a0924331c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David B. Audretsch
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- M. Vivarelli
- J. Hessels
- Zoltan J. Acs
- Roy Thurik
- Michael Fritsch
Citations in the corpus
- The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction (2008, background): “The line of research on the relationship between entrepreneurship, or more precisely business ownership rates and economic development ( Carree et al. 2002, 2007; Wennekers et al. 2005, and Amoros in this issue) is one of the most comprehensive and promising focus on the dilemma and discussion abou”
- Entrepreneurship and economic growth: Evidence from emerging and developed countries (2009, background): “For example, researchers have tried to model the effect of ‘business ownership rate’ on economic development (Carree et al. 2007).”
- Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries (2013, background): “Indeed, only when “opportunity entrepreneurs” (those motivated by progressive drivers) are distinguished from “necessity entrepreneurs” (those who are self-employed and pushed by defensive and regressive drivers, such as the fear of unemployment), a positive linear relationship between economic deve”
- Serial entrepreneurship: impact of human capital on time to re-entry (2011, background): “As individuals’ decisions to enter and exit entrepreneurship may be influenced by the unemployment level (Carree et al. 2007; Audretsch et al. 2005), a control variable for unemployment is also included, thus accounting for the macroeconomic environment.”
- Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence (2016, background): “…2003), other authors suggest that governance factors perceived by society could encourage or discourage the business dynamics in which entrepreneurship is involved (Djankov et al., 2005, 2006; Johnson et al., 1999; Johnson et al., 2000a; McMillan and Woodruff, 1999, 2002; van Stel et al., 2007).”
- Effects of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship on economic growth: panel data evidence (2017, background): “The level of national economic development also represents an important factor in explaining entrepreneurial activities (Carree et al. 2007; Wennekers et al. 2008).”
- Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions (2008, background): “Carree et al. (2007) suggested that the L-shaped and U-shaped relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development couldn’t be distinguished empirically because not all countries are in the upward part yet.”
- Quantifying the relationship between entrepreneurship and competitiveness development stages in Latin America (2011, background): “Despite the fact that entrepreneurial efforts could improve competitiveness and economic growth—namely, they could help countries transition from “managed economies” to “entrepreneurial economies”—there is evidence that shows that entrepreneurship dynamics differ not only among countries with differ”
- Total factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship (2016, methodology): “We know (Carree et al. 2007) that in (14) a[ 0 (&1/3) and that in (15) b[ 0 (&0.”
- Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America (2008, result): “These results are consistent with Carree et al. (2007) that rich or competitive countries face a decreasing degree of total entrepreneurship activity.”
- Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship (2015, background): “view of entrepreneurship consists of business owners (Martin et al. 2007).”
- New Business Formation and Regional Development: A Survey and Assessment of the Evidence (2011, background): “Despite some empirical evidence (most of which is on the wholenation level rather than covering a particular industry(21)) in support of this market “overcrowding” idea (Audretsch et al., 2002; Carree et al., 2007; Hartog et al., 2010), the concept suffers a number of drawbacks.”