The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research. Introduction

By J. M. Veciana, David Urbano. 2008

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a63841b3759db361ea4be3db0e5d8b1734d5d72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Analyzing Social Entrepreneurship from an Institutional Perspective: Evidence from Spain (2010, background): “Then, the decision to create a new enterprise is conditioned by the existing institutional framework, which conditions the actions of different agents that participate in society through a structure of incentives and opportunities (Veciana and Urbano 2008).”
Effects of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship on economic growth: panel data evidence (2017, background): “Whilst entrepreneurs are often analysed individually, they nevertheless operate across organisational, economic, social and institutional spheres (Aparicio, Urbano, and Audretsch 2016; Veciana and Urbano 2008).”
Entrepreneurial Universities (2013, methodology): “Generally, institutional economics was used to analyze the influence of environmental factors on entrepreneurship (Thornton, Ribeiro, & Urbano, 2011; Coduras, Urbano, Rojas & Martínez, 2008; Veciana & Urbano, 2008).”
Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities (2016, background): “A large body of the literature indicates that individual characteristics, attitudes and controls are amongst the most important predictors of entrepreneurial activities of academics (Louis et al. 1989; Klofsten and Jones-Evans 2000; Ding et al. 2006; Azoulay et al. 2007; Veciana and Urbano 2008).”
Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural Central Europe: A comparative institutional analysis (2014, background): “…contexts in which it emerges (Jennings et al., 2013; Thornton, 1999; Welter, 2011), as national and regional environments have become more diversified and interconnected, creating further variations in entrepreneurial activity and its contexts (Thornton et al., 2011; Veciana and Urbano, 2008).”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Hence, the institutional approach5 provides a broad insight into understanding how institutions are related to entrepreneurial activity as well as which institutions are most important for explaining entrepreneurship rates that enhance economic growth (Veciana and Urbano 2008).”
Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence (2016, background): “…between formal and informal institutions, following North (1990, 2005), or as Gnyawali and Fogel (1994) suggest in their dimensions, is necessary because formal institutions reflect the values built into the society that have been reinforced by laws and regulatory norms (Veciana and Urbano, 2008).”
Entrepreneurship in the Agricultural Sector: A Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities (2018, background): “Recent studies have demonstrated the influence of institutional factors (Welter, 2011; Zahra & Wright, 2011), and the interconnected role of national, regional, and local contexts (Lang, et al., 2014; Thornton et al., 2011; Veciana & Urbano, 2008; Marquis & Battilana, 2009) on entrepreneurship.”
GEM research: achievements and challenges (2014, methodology): “Specifically, we consider the Institutional Economic Theory (North 1990 and 2005) applied to the analysis of new business creation (Diaz et al. 2005; Urbano 2006; Veciana and Urbano 2008).”
The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship (2014, background): “Drawing from the institutional theory, Bruton et al. (2010), Veciana and Urbano (2008) or Stenholm et al. (2013) among others empirically analyze how regulative and nor-mative institutions affect entrepreneurial activity triggered by knowledge spillovers.”