New Business Formation and Regional Development: A Survey and Assessment of the Evidence

By Michael Fritsch. 2011

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10a22abb047b6a2e1d74c80e79abdb79391bf141

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions (2018, unknown): “Although Acs et al. (2014) recently undertook a cross-country analysis, making a comparison between various entrepreneurial ecosystems, several scholars have specifically directed their research towards studying region-specific ecosystems (Fritsch, 2013; Tsvetkova, 2015; Spigel, 2017).”
Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (2016, unknown): “…(Stam 2015; Spigel 2017; Stam and Spigel 2018) have shown that the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach can be used to synthesize prior academic research on the geography of entrepreneurship (see e.g. Sternberg 2009; Stam 2010) and entrepreneurship and regional development (see e.g. Fritsch 2013).”
Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements (2019, background): “The established empirical literature on the geography of entrepreneurship and economic development has revealed several factors to be of relevance in explaining the spatial heterogeneity in entrepreneurship (see Fritsch 2013; Sternberg 2009; Stam 2010; Stam and Spigel 2018).”
Entrepreneurship as an Urban Event? Empirical Evidence from European Cities (2014, background): “See REYNOLDS et al. (2005) for a detailed overview of the GEMmethodology; BOSMA (2013) for an overview of the GEM-based empirical papers; and BOSMA et al.”
The impact of entrepreneurship on economic, social and environmental welfare and its determinants: a systematic review (2020, methodology): “More specifically, it follows recent research recommendations (e.g. Block et al. 2017; Fritsch 2013; Urbano et al. 2019a) by incorporating the recent empirical stream of research on the impact of entrepreneurship in developing countries and research that goes beyond measures of common economic welfa”
Entrepreneurship in a Regional Context: Historical Roots, Recent Developments and Future Challenges (2014, background): “It then has to recognize that there is no simple and automatic link between new business formation and job creation (FRITSCH, 2013) implying that policies simply to ‘get more enterprise’ are likely to be no more successful than the Scottish Business Birth Rate strategy referred to by VAN STEL and…”
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique (2015, background): “…mentioned elements of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach (Tables 1 and 2) and, on the other hand, the insights from the existing empirical studies on entrepreneurship and (regional) economic development (Fritsch, 2013; Stam & Bosma, 2015a) could provide a better framework for regional policy.”
Industry structure, entrepreneurship, and culture: An empirical analysis using historical coalfields (2016, background): “absence of entrepreneurial role models, there will be fewer people, or nascent entrepreneurs, with the necessary knowledge and capabilities to launch a new firm (e.g., Minniti, 2005; Fritsch, 2013).”
Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions (2018, background): “Most studies find a positive and statistically significant relationship between the extent of knowledge in a region and regional economic performance (Fritsch, 2013).”
The Long Persistence of Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005 (2014, background): “There is compelling evidence that high levels of regional new business formation can be an important source of growth (for an overview, see FRITSCH, 2013).”