Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries
By M. Vivarelli. 2013
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ec3f74266bca1a6b236788ea433cb2f98fa8ec9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- David B. Audretsch
- Werner Hölzl
- Maksim Belitski
- Mariana Mazzucato
- Sven-Olov Daunfeldt
- G. Semieniuk
- Dan Johansson
- Paul Nightingale
In Economics and Econometrics
- David B. Audretsch
- Maksim Belitski
- Sven-Olov Daunfeldt
- S. Desai
- Alex Coad
- Dan Johansson
- Werner Hölzl
- Michael Fritsch
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David B. Audretsch
- Maksim Belitski
- S. Desai
- Sven-Olov Daunfeldt
- Michael Fritsch
- Alex Coad
- Werner Hölzl
- D. Storey
Citations in the corpus
- Entrepreneurship contribution to the three pillars of sustainable development: What does the evidence really say? (2018, background): “, 2010), while researchers from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) reports that the rates of entrepreneurial activity in developing countries are more higher compared to those in developed ones (Vivarelli, 2013).”
- Public financing of innovation: new questions (2017, background): “This perspective builds on studies in industry dynamics that have documented a weak relationship between entry of new firms into industries and the current levels of profits in those industries (Vivarelli, 2013).”
- Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, background): “At that stage, an important distinction is whether the potential entrepreneur perceives good business opportunities or rather is faced with the necessity to earn his or her living (Coad 2009:131; Vivarelli 2013: 1476).”
- To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, unknown): “…to survive (think, for instance to those ‘‘escapers from unemployment’’ who try an entrepreneurial adventure as a consequence of a job loss or induced by the fear to lose their jobs; see Oxenfeldt 1943; Evans and Leighton 1990; Storey 1991, 1994; Foti and Vivarelli 1994; Vivarelli 2007, 2013).”
- Necessity or opportunity? Government size, tax policy, corruption, and implications for entrepreneurship (2021, background): “Compared to necessity entrepreneurship, opportunity entrepreneurship occurs when entrepreneurs have other work options but still decide to pursue entrepreneurship (Acs et al., 2008; Vivarelli, 2004, 2013).”
- High-growth firms: Introduction to the special section (2014, background): “…evaluation of the role of entrepreneurship for economic growth, arguing that the majority of start-ups are not potential HGFs but “marginal undersized poor-performance enterprises” with limited growth ambitions and a lack of capability (see also Santarelli and Vivarelli, 2002; Vivarelli, 2013).”
- The relevance of quantity and quality entrepreneurship for regional performance: the moderating role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem (2018, background): “If the overall output remains unchanged the increased competition may lead to high churning – high entry and exit rates at the same time – and the total employment effect could be negative (Vivarelli, 2013).”
- Entrepreneurship in a Regional Context: Historical Roots, Recent Developments and Future Challenges (2014, background): “This enables researchers to take account of factors that apply nationwide such as macro-economic conditions and the role of formal institutions when examining regional variations across national borders (NAUDÉ, 2011; VIVARELLI, 2013).”
- Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: The Need for Innovative and Institutional Solutions (2017, background): “Moreover, increasing survival entrepreneurship can be counterproductive from both an environmental and an economic point of view (Vivarelli, 2013).”
- From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016, background): “This perspective builds on studies in industry dynamics that have documented a weak relationship between entry of new firms into industries and the current levels of profits in those industries (Vivarelli 2013).”