Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

National systems of entrepreneurship (2016, unknown): “If one is interested in country-level outcomes— innovation, competitiveness, growth (Audretsch et al. 2015)—there are at least three approaches to understanding what makes countries and regions perform better over the past quarter century: national system of innovation (Nelson 1993); the…”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Additionally, it has been found that 11 See for example Aubrey et al. (2015), Audretsch et al. (2015a), Bosma et al. (2011), Braunerhjelm and Borgman (2004), van Stel et al. (2005). entrepreneurship plays a useful role as a conduit of knowledge spillover that positively affects economic growth12.”
The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES’ innovation performance (2016, background): “Innovation has been considered as either the ability to develop products able to meet the consumers’ needs or the ability to use existing technology to develop new products (Audretsch et al. 2015, 2016) or to improve existing ones (Adler and Shenhar 1990).”