Doing away with ‘study skills’

By U. Wingate. 2006

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7af8579809f3cae396876828475d8dfaf104f30d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. K. Rajagopalan
2. J. Greig
3. Steven Roberts
4. Judith Gullifer
5. Chi Baik
6. G. Tyson

Citations in the corpus

• Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students' understanding of plagiarism (2014, background): “This process requires understanding of the rationale for attribution and how to cite original sources in order to avoid plagiarism (Wingate 2006).”
• The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (2018, background): “This, however, is an ontological mistake, as human beings are social and private at the same time.”
• Traditional practice for non‐traditional students? Examining the role of pedagogy in higher education retention (2011, background): “…beyond the well-rehearsed arguments regarding the deficiencies associated with additional and remedial student support services (e.g. Cottrel 2001; Wingate 2006) and to re-position the spotlight to consider and problematise the ‘standard’ HE offering in relation to its increasingly…”
• Focusing on how students study (2010, background): “…to identify the techniques that are optimal (e.g., Gurung, 2005; Hattie, Biggs, and Purdie, 1996; Kobayashi, 2006; Metcalfe, 2009; Robbins, Lauver, Le, Davis, and Langley, 2004; Wingate, 2006; Worrell et al., 2010; see Gurung and Schwartz, 2009 and Hattie, 2009 for extensive reviews and summaries).”
• Improving the academic outcomes of undergraduate ESL students: the case for discipline‐based academic skills programs (2009, background): “Durkin & Main, 2002 ; Hyland, 2002 ; Wingate, 2006 ) and research into the impact of these programs on student learning outcomes is limited.”