Traditional practice for non‐traditional students? Examining the role of pedagogy in higher education retention

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Student retention and engagement in higher education (2020, background): “…et al. 2016), non-traditional students (i.e. low socioeconomic group, non-campus, part-time and mature students, e.g. Davidson and Wilson 2013; Roberts 2011; Sadowski, Stewart, and Pediaditis 2018; Thomas 2011; Yorke and Thomas 2003), rural students (Hlinka 2017), distance/open/e students…”
Causes of differences in student outcomes (2015, background): “consensus that curricula, learning, teaching and assessment practices impact significantly on student engagement and experiences (Crozier et al., 2008; David et al., 2009; Roberts, 2011; Burke et al., 2013) and ultimately outcomes.”