CONSUMER RESPONSE TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: MARKET SEGMENT ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCERS AND POLICY MAKERS

By Gregory Baker, Thomas A. Burnham. 2001

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a6cf245063265ef1eae6bf78c97726a692afd94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food — A meta-analysis (2009, background): “1 Baker and Burnham (2001) 2000 Random Choice experiment Mail No America Cornflakes 40 L 2 Baker and Mazzocco (2002) 2001 Random Choice experiment Mail No America Bananas 67 H 3 Boccaletti and Moro (2000) 1999 Random Payment card Phone Yes Europe General −7 H, L”
Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Food Products in Japan (2003, background): “These results support the findings of Baker and Burnham (2001) that cognitive variables (opinions, beliefs,”
Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago (2012, background): “Examples of environmental applications that use cluster analysis include Aldrich et al. (2007), Baker and Burnham (2001), and Pennings and Leuthold (2000).”
Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy (2008, background): “Certainly, following Baker and Burnham (2001) and Onyango et al. (2003), the US consumers ‘attitudinal’ segment can be partially explained by cognitive variables that are not necessarily observed.”
Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment (2006, background): “…used to assess consumer’s choices among food product attributes including food safety (e.g., growth hormones and fed genetic corn in beef) and animal welfare (e.g., Alfnes, 2004; Alfnes & Rickertsen, 2003; Baker & Burnham, 2001; Carlsson, Frykblom, & Lagerkvist, 2005a; Lusk, Roosen, & Fox, 2003).”
CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FOOD LABELING: A DISCUSSION OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2003, methodology): “Baker and Burnham (2001) used a conjoint analysis survey to determine U.S. consumer response to genetically modified foods.”
Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France (2004, unknown): “Baker and Burnham, 2001; Burton et al., 2001; Lusk et al., 2001, 2002, 2003; Noussair et al., 2002; Lusk, 2003a; see Lusk et al. (2004) for a review).”