Cognitive and affective dimensions of trust in developing team performance
By F. Erdem, Janset Ozen. 2003
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a5dfded1f8abd6dc65ef78df5430c08663e0616
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Neil Anderson
- Jose Luis Daniel
- Ashley Fulmer
- Ana Cristina Costa
- R. Ortiz-Walters
- Nora Y. Madjar
- Jing Zhou
- Markus Baer
In Social Psychology
- Jose Luis Daniel
- Ana Cristina Costa
- H. Ullah
- R. Ortiz-Walters
- Neil Anderson
- Ashley Fulmer
- M. Hussain
- Z. Ahmad
Citations in the corpus
- The effect of workplace spirituality on team effectiveness (2010, background): “The use of teams has become the symbol of an ideal model of work and working behavior for organizations (Erden and Ozen, 2003).”
- Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions (2018, background): “…(Matzler & Renzl, 2007), as well as open communication and knowledge sharing between members (Edmondson, 2004), satisfaction with the team (Chou, et al., 2008), proactive idea implementation and problem solving (Parker, Williams, & Turner, 2006), and team performance (Erdem & Ozen, 2003).”
- Effect of Teamwork on Employee Performance (2011, background): “Organization should transform the trustworthy behaviour for measurement into performance appraisal system to promote the organizational values (Erdem et al., 2003).”
- Trust in Supervisors and Trust in Customers: Their Independent, Relative, and Joint Effects on Employee Performance and Creativity (2009, background): “Conversely, although our study positioned trust as a facilitator of creativity, some research on teams suggests that too much trust may have an adverse impact on work-related outcomes, because it can lead to “groupthink” ( Erdem & Ozen, 2003 ).”