Unpacking the Gender System

By Cecilia L. Ridgeway, Shelley J. Correll. 2004

1,409 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

Citations in the corpus

Diagnosing Gender Bias in Image Recognition Systems (2020, background): “Following studies of gender, classification, and status inequalities (Ridgeway 2011, 2014; Ridgeway and Correll 2004) we suggest that image recognition systems reproduce the status inequalities and gender stereotypes at play in wider social structure.”
Race and Gender in Families and at Work (2008, background): “…of the fatherhood wage premium remain somewhat elusive, most gender scholars argue that the premium—and its corollary, the motherhood wage penalty—reflect institutionalized gender inequalities and essentialist cultural conceptions of motherhood and fatherhood (Ridgeway and Correll 2004a, 2004b).”
Personal, Master, and Alternative Narratives: An Integrative Framework for Understanding Identity Development in Context (2016, background): “For others, full engagement in a working life may result in feelings of inferiority or loss for not realizing nurturing roles [see Ridgeway & Correll, 2004].”
The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation1 (2013, background): “…universes” ðBlair-Loy 2003, p. 176Þ. Gender schemas can vary in progressiveness or traditionalism, in how widespread they are ðnationally held ideologies or those specific to a particular subcultureÞ, and in how explicitly in conflict they are with other cultural models ðRidgeway and Correll 2004Þ.”
Gender and leadership emergence: A meta‐analysis and explanatory model (2018, background): “…members have known each other prior to selecting a leader (Eagly & Karau, 1991).2 Gender is one of the most salient surface-level characteristics (Ridgeway & Correll, 2004; Stangor, Lynch, Duan, & Glas, 1992), and stereotypes of men tend to align with leadership roles (Eagly & Karau, 2002;…”
Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment (2020, background): “In most workplaces, more situationally relevant identities, such as a person’s occupational role, are in the foreground as people evaluate and make sense of others, and gender identities remain in the background (Ridgeway and Correll 2004).”
Gender Inequality in Product Markets: When and How Status Beliefs Transfer to Products (2017, methodology): “These beliefs are important because they affect relative expectations individuals have for the performance of individuals in evaluative contexts (Ridgeway and Correll 2004).”
Stereotypes About Gender and Science (2016, background): “…women to a general animus toward women, but to the degree of incongruity in the perceived traits of women with those called for in various social roles (see Heilman & Haynes, 2008; Koch, D’Mello, & Sacket, 2015; Lee, Fiske, & Glick, 2010; Powell, 2011; Ridgeway & Correll, 2004; Rudman, 2005).”
Why Status Matters for Inequality (2014, background): “…attributions of ability, influence, and situational rewards between otherwise equal men and women, whites and non-whites, and middleclass and working-class people (Correll and Ridgeway 2003; Driskell and Mullen 1990; Ridgeway and Correll 2004; Ridgeway and Fisk 2012; Webster and Driskell 1978).”