Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review

By D. Shaffer. 2011

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/359dea9516c8782411654bf00957c7f98800afc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Mackenzie
2. David B. Wilson
3. Ojmarrh Mitchell
4. Amy Eggers
5. F. Cullen
6. E. Gondolf
7. Eric P. Baumer
8. Mark Lipsey

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Mackenzie
2. David B. Wilson
3. Ojmarrh Mitchell
4. Amy Eggers
5. Eric P. Baumer
6. F. Cullen
7. David P. Farrington
8. Mark Lipsey

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts (2012, methodology): “…drug courts’ effectiveness in reducing wilsonb@gmu.edu @psu.edu (D.L. MacKenzie). rights reserved. recidivism is weakest among the most methodologically rigorous evaluations (e.g., Belenko, 2001; U.S. General Accounting Office [GAO], 1997, 2005; Shaffer, 2011; Wilson, Mitchell, & MacKenzie, 2006).”