Research quality considerations for grounded theory research in sport & exercise psychology

By M. Weed. 2009

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Resilience in Youth Sport: A Qualitative Investigation of Gymnastics Coach and Athlete Perceptions (2015, background): “Due to the limited understanding of the relationship between resilience and sport, the inductive nature of qualitative research was important for discovering coaching behaviours and environmental aspects perceived to foster resilience [30].”
What works in coach learning, how, and for whom? A grounded process of soccer coaches’ professional learning (2017, methodology): “A ‘Straussian’ approach was adopted as a set of flexible analytical strategies, characterised by a pragmatic position that sits between post-positivism and constructivism (Weed 2009).”
A holistic perspective on career development in UK female soccer players: A negative case analysis (2015, methodology): “Prior to these proposals and in keeping with recommendations for grounded theory research (e.g., Weed, 2009; Tamminen & Holt, 2010), we shall first outline the point of departure from previous literature.”
Assumptions in research in sport and exercise psychology (2009, background): “Therefore, the assumptions that researchers make affect evaluations of research quality at both the micro- and macro-level (see Weed, 2009 ).”
A grounded theory of psychological resilience in Olympic champions (2012, methodology): “This approach is known as the constant comparative method and is one of the core elements of grounded theory (Holt & Tamminen, 2010a; Weed, 2009).”