Theory of Mind in Infancy

By Beate Sodian. 2011

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pharmacy, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76439a016709fe8da44f100bc62456771e55b2e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. T. Ruffman
2. Henry Wellman
3. D. Poulin-Dubois
4. J. Yott
5. C. Peterson
6. V. Slaughter
7. J. de Villiers
8. Stephanie M. Carlson

In Pharmacy

1. D. Poulin-Dubois
2. J. Yott
3. Henry Wellman
4. T. Ruffman

In Social Psychology

1. Henry Wellman
2. T. Ruffman
3. D. Poulin-Dubois
4. J. Yott
5. C. Peterson
6. V. Slaughter
7. Stephanie M. Carlson

Citations in the corpus

• Theory of mind: The state of the art* (2018, background): “While these studies are clever and revealing, how their findings should best be interpreted remains controversial, prompting, for example, further research and research summaries (for critical reviews, see e.g. Heyes, 2014; Sodian, 2011; Wellman, 2014).”
• To belief or not belief: Children’s theory of mind (2014, background): “…Geraci, 2012), and there are many who argue that an understanding of mental states is innate (BaronCohen, 1997; Legerstee, Barna, & DiAdamo, 2000; Leslie, 1987; Premack, 1990; Scott & Baillargeon, 2009), or develops in the first few months of life (Luo, 2011b; Sodian, 2011; Vaish & Woodward, 2005).”
• Probing the depth of infants’ theory of mind: Disunity in performance across paradigms (2017, background): “…is a consensus that children pass the traditional, explicit false belief task during the preschool period, research over the past decade suggests that even infants might possess some form of understanding of people’s mind (see Poulin- Dubois, Brooker, & Chow, 2009 and Sodian, 2011, for reviews).”