To belief or not belief: Children’s theory of mind

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theory of Mind Development in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: The Growing Complexity of Recursive Thinking Ability (2015, background): “It may be interesting to underline that in the general overview provided so far, the tasks evaluate the socio-relational components of theory of mind, that belong to the implicit aspects of theory of mind reasoning (Ruffman, 2014), thus neglecting the evaluation of the increasing complexity of meta-”
Probing the depth of infants’ theory of mind: Disunity in performance across paradigms (2017, background): “This rich interpretation of non- elicited responses in implicit ToM tasks is currently the subject of a hot debate (Apperly & Butterfill, 2009; Heyes, 2014; Perner, 2010; Ruffman, 2014; Ruffman & Perner, 2005).”
Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind (2020, background): “…is in order first: to argue that implicit forms of Theory of Mind are important for social cognitionmight seem controversial at this point, given the ongoing debate around false-belief studies with infants and whether babies have a Theory of Mind (e.g., Heyes 2014; Ruffman 2014; Rakoczy 2017).”