Fairness as a constraint on trust in reciprocity: earned property rights in a reciprocal exchange experiment

By René Fahr, Bernd Irlenbusch. 2000

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7609cc6bee9482d64cf898061334ae58999796fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Endowment Heterogeneity and Origin on Public Good Contributions: Evidence From the Lab (2005, unknown): “…1998; List and Cherry, 2000), though other studies have employed various measures of effort: preparing letters (Konow, 2000), solving a computerized puzzle (Rutstr̈om and Williams, 2000), finding a way through a computerized maze (Gn ezy, 2003) and cracking walnuts (Fahr and Irlenbusch, 2000).”
Performance Pay and Multi-Dimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences and Gender (2006, unknown): “, Fahr and Irlenbusch (2000) who have subjects crack walnuts, van Dijk, Sonnemans and van Winden (2001) who asked subjects to perform cognitively demanding tasks on the computer, Gneezy et al.”
Trust in Children (2002, result): “16 This finding differs from that of Fahr and Irlenbusch (2000). They examine trust games where individual’s performance in a walnut-cracking task determines their initial endowments.”
Do people trust too much or too little (2009, unknown): “Thus, whereas in our Study 2 of participants were more trusting if they had to work for their initial endowment, Fahr and Irlenbusch (2000) found that their participants were less trustful if they had to work for their initial endowment.”
Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity (2001, background): “Moreover, there is frequently a strong correlation between z and the amount sent back at the individual as well as at the aggregate level (see e.g., Miller 1997, Fahr and Irlenbusch 2000, Cox 2000).”
Why labour market experiments (2003, background): “In Fahr and Irlenbusch (2000), e.g., subjects had to crack walnuts, in van Dijk, Sonnemans and van Winden (2001) subjects performed cognitively demanding tasks on the computer (two-variable optimisation problems) and in Gneezy (2003) subjects had to solve mazes at the computer.”