Standardised Benchmarking in the Quest for Orthologs

By Adrian M. Altenhoff, Brigitte Boeckmann, Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez, Daniel A. Dalquen, Todd F. DeLuca, Kristoffer Forslund, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Benjamin Linard, Cécile Pereira, Leszek P. Pryszcz and 20 more. 2016

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Achieving high accuracy in orthology inference is essential for many comparative, evolutionary and functional genomic analyses, yet the true evolutionary history of genes is generally unknown and orthologs are used for very different applications across phyla, requiring different precision–recall trade-offs. As a result, it is difficult to assess the performance of orthology inference methods. Here, we present a community effort to establish standards and an automated web-based service to facilitate orthology benchmarking. Using this service, we characterize 15 well-established inference methods and resources on a battery of 20 different benchmarks. Standardized benchmarking provides a way for users to identify the most effective methods for the problem at hand, sets a minimum requirement for new tools and resources, and guides the development of more accurate orthology inference methods.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Safety Research

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Peer Bork
  2. Ivica Letunic
  3. C. von Mering
  4. Lars Juhl Jensen
  5. Damian Szklarczyk
  6. Jaime Huerta-Cepas
  7. Christophe Dessimoz
  8. Kristoffer Forslund

Citations in the corpus