Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms
By R. Narasimhan, Soo Wook Kim. 2002
798 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/753073535267bcaee8429d8334fa79ff36317549
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Baofeng Huo
- Chee Yew Wong
- Sakun Boon-itt
- Xiande Zhao
- Mark A. Jacobs
- Wantao Yu
- Robert B. Handfield
- Angappa Gunasekaran
Citations in the corpus
- Entrepreneurial Competencies and SMEs Business Success: The Contingent Role of External Integration (2015, background): “External integration of a firm constitutes the strategic alliance with its customers and suppliers to build strategic partnerships with them to develop strategies for availing market opportunities (Narasimhan & Kim, 2002).”
- The Effect of Operational Slack, Diversification, and Vertical Relatedness on the Stock Market Reaction to Supply Chain Disruptions (2009, background): “A growing body of literature has highlighted the importance of supply chain integration in improving the performance of supply chains and responding to disruptions (Narasimhan and Jayaram, 1998; Frohlich and Westbrook, 2001; Narasimhan and Kim, 2002; Vickery et al., 2003; Das et al., 2006).”
- The impact of marketing capability, operations capability and diversification strategy on performance: A resource-based view (2010, background): “It is widely accepted that efficient linkage of various internal functions within an organization and interactions among them is crucial to manage the ‘curvilinear effects’ of diversification on performance (Narasimhan & Kim, 2002; Palich et al., 2000).”
- The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance (2014, methodology): “The measures for SCI were mainly adopted from the literature (Chen and Paulraj, 2004; Flynn et al., 2010; Narasimhan and Kim, 2002; Stank et al., 2001).”
- Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies (2005, background): “This refers to the degree of correspondence between company and customers, whereby customers respond to the company regarding the output delivered or to be delivered to customers (Narasimhan and Kim, 2002).”
- Strategic purchasing, supply management practices and buyer performance improvement: an empirical study of UK manufacturing organisations (2009, methodology): “We measured supplier integration using a four-item scale validated by Narasimhan and Kim (2002) and others (Monczka and Morgan 1996, Carr and Pearson 1999).”
- Supplier integration—Finding an optimal configuration (2006, background): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.003 development, and improved business performance (Narasimhan and Kim, 2002; Pisano, 1994; Rosenzweig et al., 2003), little attention has been directed to its potential for rent destruction.”
- Manufacturing Practices and Strategy Integration: Effects on Cost Efficiency, Flexibility, and Market-Based Performance (2005, background): “…have tended to emphasize their benefits toward cost reduction and efficiency attained primarily through increased purchasing volume leverage and through reduced uncertainty and disturbance in product sourcing and replenishment cycles (Flynn et al., 1994, 1995a, 1995b; Narasimhan & Kim, 2002).”