The Relation of Gender, Personality, and Intelligence to Judges' Accuracy in Judging Strangers' Personality From Brief Video Segments

By Richard A. Lippa, J. Dietz. 2000

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75254c8632a63440ff0b3d72f3d63dbdf6c53175

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Gender Studies

Citations in the corpus

Language With Character: A Stratified Corpus Comparison of Individual Differences in E-Mail Communication (2006, background): “main models: Extraversion (or Extraversion–Introversion) and Neuroticism (Emotionality–Stability) (Matthews et al., 2003; Lippa and Dietz, 2000).”
Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction (2006, background): “Although the concept of personality has been conceptualized in countless different ways, one of the most acknowledged conceptualizations is to cluster the number of personality traits into the ‘‘Big Five Factors’’ (John & Srivastava, 1999).”
TARGET ARTICLES: "Seven Myths About Emotional Intelligence" (2004, background): “Ironically, empathic accuracy is better predicted by conventional intelligence (Lippa & Dietz, 2000).”
Future employment selection methods: evaluating social networking web sites (2009, background): “found that less sociable (extroverted) raters were more accurate, while Lippa and Dietz (2000)”
The Good Judge Revisited: Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Personality Judgments (2005, background): “Although not widely investigated, some evidence confirms that general intelligence may be related to accuracy in judging others’ emotions (Davis & Kraus, 1997) and personality traits (Lippa & Dietz, 2000).”
Accuracy of judging others' traits and states: Comparing mean levels across tests (2008, methodology): “The correlation is then translated into the cell proportions of the BESD using the formula: BESD values ¼ :50 ðr=2Þ: As an example, consider the accuracy correlation of r = .28 from the study of Lippa and Dietz (2000) described above.”
A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions (2007, methodology): “Gender diVerences Accuracy research often demonstrates that female judges are more accurate than male judges, particularly when judging emotions (see meta-analyses by Hall, 1978, 1984; and McClure, 2000).”