Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: a structuration perspective

By Yadong Luo. 2006

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74184c6f2bfc13cf3838e7415043e44fa61b5be9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Digital technologies: tensions in privacy and data (2022, background): “In response to regulatory and consumer actions, firms might comply with privacy rules (reactive response) or go beyond them to engage in privacy innovation (proactive response), which potentially shapes new structures (Luo, 2006).”
The role of path dependency and managerial intentionality: a perspective on international business research (2007, background): “Other influences on MI from the firm’s environment can, for example, be ongoing debates on climate protection or corruption (i.e., Husted and Allen, 2006; Luo, 2006; Rodriguez et al., 2006).”
Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives (2017, background): “Luo (2006) examines the relation between CSR and the political strategy of multinational enterprises.”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, unknown): “Arora and Kazmi 2012; Bird 2009; Cash 2012; Reed 2002b) and those derived from meeting the expectations of power-holders such as: (a) host governments (e.g. Cash 2012; Luo 2006; Shengtian et al. 2010); (b) country elites (e.”
International business research and risky investments, an analysis of FDI in conflict zones (2013, result): “…and Ghazali (2007) demonstrate that ownership concentration is associated with less attention to CSR at the firm level, consistent the burgeoning literature on CSR within international business, see for example Luo (2006), Rodriguez et al (2006), Husted and Allen (2006) and Strike et al (2006).”
Can the Media Discipline Chinese Firms’ Pollution Behaviors? The Mediating Effects of the Public and Government (2016, background): “…government can make decisive choices on a wide range of issues that affect firms’ operations, implement their decisions in a more direct and powerful manner (Luo, 2006), and effectively alter the supply–demand relationship by enforcing certain environmental standards (Kassinis & Vafeas, 2006).”
Using Organization Structure to Buffer Political Ties in Emerging Markets: A Case Study (2012, unknown): “…when these ties amount to corruption (i.e. when an official uses his/her position for private gain) even though the boundary between legal and illegal political connections is sometimes difficult to demarcate because legal and cultural standards differ across emerging economies (Luo, 2006).”
Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives (2012, background): “Some TNCs self-regulate their behavior by creating and enforcing codes of conduct for their own operations, and sometimes also for their suppliers’ (Arya & Salk, 2006; Sethi, 2003; van Tulder & Kolk, 2001), they set environmental management systems that go beyond state requirements (Christmann & Tay”
Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys (2010, background): “Luo (2006) argues that firms that perceive the host government to be corrupt are less likely to cooperate with it, and may even decrease their philanthropic activities.”
Why and how might firms respond strategically to violent conflict? (2012, background): “the trade in conflict diamonds; Bennett, 2002; Dunfee & Fort, 2003), and engaging in philanthropic activities to aid victims of the conflict (Luo, 2006; van Tulder & Kolk, 2001).”
Institutional Strategies in Emerging Markets (2015, background): “We foreground the importance of institutional strategies in emerging markets because the rapid co-evolution of the economy and society (Luo, 2006) suggests that organizations need to adopt a strategic perspective that encompasses both market imperatives and social and cultural concerns.”