Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science.

By P. Manicas, P. F. Secord. 1983

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, neutral): “…2016; Lombrozo and Carey, 2006; Lombrozo and Gwynne, 2014a; Lombrozo, Sloman, Strevens, Trout, and Skolnick Weisberg, 2008; Malle, 1999,2004, 2011; Manicas and Secord, 1983; McClure, 2002; McClure and Hilton, 1997, 1998; McClure, Sutton, and Hilton, 2003; Malle, 1999, 2004, 2011; Rey, 2012;…”
The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan (2000, background): “Crucially, it is possible for these criteria to be rational precisely because there is a world that exists independently of our cognizant experience [144].”
Dialogical Sequence Analysis and the Zone of Proximal Development as Conceptual Enhancements to the Assimilation Model: The Case of Jan Revisited (2001, background): “Each of these formulations of assimilation may be considered as attempts to understand a common underlying phenomenon (Manicas & Secord, 1983; Stiles, Honos-Webb, & Lani, 1999).”
The Chaos Theory of Careers (2003, unknown): “Pryor, R. G. L. (1991). Assessing people's interests, values and”
How Do We Justify Knowledge Produced Within Interpretive Approaches? (2005, background): “Advocates of this response such as Hammersley (1990), Manicas and Secord (1983), Maxwell (1992), and Seale (2003) accept the interpretive idea that knowledge claims are dependent on the person who makes them.”