The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan
By T. Goles, R. Hirschheim. 2000
337 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcf4d92ebc87bbd50955a032c24e82b5ef045568
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Göran Goldkuhl
- John C. Mingers
- Rana Koroglu
- Prakash J. Singh
- Mary C. Lacity
- Anand Jeyaraj
- Joseph W. Rottman
- Kevin Burgess
In Sociology and Political Science
- Mary C. Lacity
- Göran Goldkuhl
- John C. Mingers
- Anand Jeyaraj
- Joseph W. Rottman
- Rana Koroglu
- Prakash J. Singh
- Kevin Burgess
In Strategy and Management
- Mary C. Lacity
- John C. Mingers
- Rana Koroglu
- Prakash J. Singh
- Anand Jeyaraj
- Joseph W. Rottman
- Kevin Burgess
- Göran Goldkuhl
Citations in the corpus
- Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology (2001, background): “Moving now to the follow-up study example, Ngwenyama and Lee (1977) make a very similar point in their analysis of some of the e-mail transcripts from Markus’s (1994a) paper using Habermas’s (1979) theory of communicative action.”
- Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research (2006, methodology): “…to practical difficulties in developing such methods, given the diametrically opposed assumptions that are made (“paradigm incommensurability” (Burrell and Morgan, 1979)), the silos that operate within SCM, and the observations about research practices that Goles and Hirschheim (2000) make above.”
- Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research (2012, background): “There seems to be an emphasis in Goles & Hirschheim (2000) for a pragmatic pluralism without considering other important pragmatic elements like, for instance, referential pragmatism.”
- A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research (2006, methodology): “Although there is much dispute in the organizational and IS literature on the notion of a paradigm (Burrell and Morgan, 1979; Willmott, 1993; Hirschheim and Goles, 2000), we use Kuhn’s definition as ‘model problems and solutions to a research community’ (Kuhn, 1970: viii).”
- Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems (2004, background): “The common demands that research should be relevant (rather than or as well as rigorous) is also clearly driven by principles of pragmatism (Goles and Hirschheim 2000).”
- A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 (2004, background): “Other discussions in relation to paradigmatic or methodological issues in recent years can also be found in Cook & Brown (1999), Farhoomand & Drury (1999), Goles & Hirschheim (2000), Hirschheim & Klein (1992), Iivari & Hirschheim (1996), Iivari et al .”