The problem of functional localization in the human brain

By Matthew Brett, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Adrian M. Owen. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2002

1,273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/73f4968f23ac9fa4420b92cb356d1f5321f5e18f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging (2004, background): “Cytoarchitectonic subdivisions are thought to correspond well with functional boundaries, although there is little agreement about the functions of specific subregions (for review, see Ref”
The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. (2009, methodology): “These MNI152 and MNI305 spaces are essentially equivalent as the brains used to create the MNI152 template were first registered to the MNI305 brain using a 9 parameter affine transform (Brett et al. 2002).”
Virtual spatial registration of stand-alone fNIRS data to MNI space (2007, methodology): “For expression of functional imaging data in these stereotaxic systems, structural brain imaging data are “normalized” or fit to the standard template brain by linear and nonlinear transformation processes (reviewed in Brett et al., 2002).”
Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps (2005, background): “This reference space, however, is not precisely aligned to the AC–PC line, connecting the anterior with the posterior commissure (Brett et al. 2002).”
Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification (2013, neutral): “Even if anatomical variations could be taken into account, differences in functional organization are also important (Brett et al., 2002).”
On the nature of emotion regulation. (2004, background): “Researchers universally recognize the extraordinary promise of this new approach to inquiry into emotion and its regulation (for an excellent, accessible primer, see Brett, Johnsrude, & Owen, 2002 ).”
Modulation of cortical-limbic pathways in major depression: treatment-specific effects of cognitive behavior therapy. (2004, background): “plate within SPM99, which references brain locations in 3-dimensional space relative to the anterior commissure.(45,46) The”
Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks (2011, methodology): “Any papers that converted MNI to Talairach space using the mni2tal Brett transform (Brett et al., 2002) were converted back to MNI and reconverted using the icbm2tal Lancaster transform.”
The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused (2007, background): “We take this approach to minimize the effects of anatomic and functional variability between individuals (Brett et al., 2002; Uylings et al., 2005) and the inconsistent correlation between surface anatomy and cytoarchitectonics (Uylings et al., 2005).”
Applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging for market research (2007, background): “Finally, the interpretation of neuroimaging data is much more complex than that of behavioral data or information derived from questionnaires (Kosslyn, 1999).”
The rewards of music listening: Response and physiological connectivity of the mesolimbic system (2005, methodology): “MNI coordinates were transformed to Talairach coordinates using a non-linear transformation (Brett et al., 2002).”
The BrainMap strategy for standardization, sharing, and meta-analysis of neuroimaging data (2011, methodology): “has been shown to provide improved fit as compared to the earlier mni2tal transform [22], and improve the accuracy of coordinate-based meta-analyses [23].”
Mindful emotion regulation: An integrative review. (2009, background): “Brett, Johnsrude, and Owen (2002) suggest that there are clear conceptual and observable links between ER and certain areas of the prefrontal cortex (PFC).”
Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies (2003, background): “noux, 1988), some uncertainty remains concerning the possibility to compare activation coordinates from one study to another (Brett et al., 2002).”
Neuroimaging of the Periaqueductal Gray: State of the Field (2011, background): “…part of the variability in functional localization may be attributed to methodological differences over the years and across statistical packages (Brett et al., 2002; Poline et al., 2006), careful and detailed neuroanatomical labeling is necessary for the ability to compare results across labs…”
A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data (2005, methodology): “Although these templates are roughly based on the Talairach space, they do not match the Talairach brain in size and shape (Brett et al., 2002).”