Making a Difference: Organization as Design

By Georges Romme. Organ. Sci., 2003

671 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7351da7a5ddcfe94fc8d5dfe2d13ecfd6931c3f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The importance of design for firms' competitiveness: a review of the literature (2014, background): “The literature reviewed in this subsection does not encompass the contributions to organisational studies that explore how design-led reasoning can be exploited to build firms’ business models (Pandza and Thorpe, 2010, Forthcoming in Technovation, 2014 Romme, 2003, Zott and Amit, 2007, 2010).”
Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms (2007, unknown): “…and organization theory has begun to address the important role of design in the entrepreneurship process (Hargadom and Douglas 2001, Romme 2003, Van de Ven, Hudson and Schroeder 1984), relatively little is known about the specific trade-offs and performance implications of business…”
Educating Managers From an Evidence-Based Perspective (2007, background): “Thoughful use of design processes is required to create a truly effective community out of management education’s disparate constituencies (cf. Boland & Collopy, 2004; Romme, 2003; Rousseau, 2006b).”
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research (2011, background): “Similarly, cause-effect relationships are the main building blocks of the organizational design literature and have recently received increasing attention (e.g., Burton & Obel, 2004; Grandori & Furnari, 2008; Romme, 2003; Van Aken, 2005).”
Beyond Good Intentions: Designing CSR Initiatives for Greater Social Impact (2020, methodology): “A design approach requires CSR researchers to account for each firm’s unique situation, as no two are the same (Romme, 2003; van Aken, 2005).”
Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness (2008, methodology): “& Collopy (2004), Romme (2003) and others who suggest that the value of theorizing lies in the”
Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship (2014, background): “If any, then the epistemological perspective we have taken in this paper is rooted in a pragmatic view of the world that acknowledges the complementary nature of narrative, positivist and design knowledge (Gross, 2009; Romme, 2003).”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, unknown): “While proponents who regard the social science as a ‘design science’ push for a stronger consideration of application (Romme, 2003), this does not reflect the mainstream view amongst most social scientists.”