Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract of fish and the potential application of prebiotics and probiotics in finfish aquaculture

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids (2010, background): “Several general reviews have been published over the past decade summarising the latest available literature (Ringø and Gatesoupe, 1998; Gatesoupe, 1999; Ringø and Birkbeck, 1999; Vershuere et al., 2000; Irianto and Austin, 2002a; Ringø, 2004; Burr et al., 2005; Balcázar et al., 2006a;Gram and Ringø”
Modulation of nutrient digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in aquatic animals: The functional feed additives scenario (2017, background): “In a previous review, Burr et al. (2005) revealed that amylase activity of the GI tract microbiota from ayu, or sweet fish (Plecoglossus altivelis), common carp, channel cat fish (Ictalurus punctatus), Japanese eel (Anguilla japonicus) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) was higher in anaerobic…”
Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract of fish and the potential application of probiotics and prebiotics in finfish aquaculture (2009, neutral): “…Pediococcus, Streptococcus and Carnobacterium spp. to Bacillus, Flavobacterium, Cytophaga, Pseudomonas, Alteromonas, Aeromonas, Enterococcus, Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter, and Vibrio spp., yeast (Saccharomyces, Debaryomyces) and etc. (Irianto and Austin 2002; Burr et al. 2005; Sahu et al. 2008).”