Creative Leadership Processes in Project Team Development: An Alternative to Tuckman's Stage Model

By Tudor Rickards, Susan Moger. 2000

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72fd0acf78482613ca31eaf7f9862b6b8b8039ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. R. Kark
2. O. Epitropaki
3. C. Mainemelis
4. James Moultrie
5. Alasdair R. Young
6. John D. Politis
7. Bilian Lin

In Mechanical Engineering

1. James Moultrie
2. Alasdair R. Young
3. John D. Politis
4. O. Epitropaki
5. R. Kark
6. C. Mainemelis

In Social Psychology

1. R. Kark
2. O. Epitropaki
3. C. Mainemelis
4. James Moultrie
5. Alasdair R. Young
6. John D. Politis
7. R. Lord
8. Bilian Lin

Citations in the corpus

• Exploratory Study of Organizational Creativity in Creative Organizations (2009, background): “A study to understand factors which enable teams to succeed in producing creative results (Rickards & Moger, 2000) led to the revision of the popular Tuckman and Jensen model for group development (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977).”
• Dispersed leadership predictor of the work environment for creativity and productivity (2005, background): “The rationale of creative leadership then is to promote a positive climate akin to consideration and transformational leadership (Rickards and Moger, 2000).”
• Creative Leadership: A Multi-Context Conceptualization† (2015, background): “Creative leaders in the Facilitating context also need to connect the team with various external sources of information and to successfully champion a new idea in the work context (Mumford et al., 2002, 2014; Rickards & Moger, 2000).”