A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness

By J. Gosen, John B. Washbush. 2004

380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72d2f1df37d93c96bbaf64943314ae6653371485

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. L. Tomkins
2. E. Ulus
3. L. Lawton
4. P. Anderson
5. Petri Nokelainen
6. Mark Loon
7. Robin Bell

In Education

1. Laura Pylväs
2. L. Tomkins
3. E. Ulus
4. L. Lawton
5. Heta Rintala
6. P. Anderson
7. Susanna Hartikainen
8. Petri Nokelainen

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. E. Ulus
2. Mark Loon
3. Robin Bell

Citations in the corpus

• Business Simulations and Cognitive Learning (2009, background): “As noted by Gosen and Washbush (2004), there is little payoff for expending the effort to design and execute the rigorous research designs needed to pursue assessment at these cognitive levels.”
• More Than Fun and Games: Reconsidering the Virtues of Strategic Management Simulations (2005, background): “Recently, the effectiveness of experiential learning using simulations has been addressed (Gosen & Washbush, 2004).”
• ‘Oh, was that “experiential learning”?!’ Spaces, synergies and surprises with Kolb’s learning cycle (2016, background): “In many ways, EL appears to be as much a movement as a theory (Reynolds, 2009), a practice whose adoption is often a matter of faith (Gosen and Washbush, 2004).”
• The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education (2019, background): “In addition, the authors of [31] reviewed studies on experiential learning techniques and argued that even though it can be noted that learning had occurred in the original articles, the methodological investigation revealed that the results did not meet the highest of research design and measuremen”
• Games as an Interactive Classroom Technique: Perceptions of Corporate Trainers, College Instructors and Students (2007, background): “More recently, Gosen and Washbush (2004) evaluated 39 studies in which simulations and experiential learning were assessed.”