Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning

By M. Lubatkin, Juan Florin, P. Lane. 2001

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7217df456af14cce46388044497490ebce3d3866

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries (2017, background): “, 2001), and integrate different knowledge bases (Lubatkin et al., 2001).”
A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance (2004, background): “, 2001), seek more radical innovations by integrating knowledge from different areas of science and technology (Lubatkin et al., 2001; Nummela, 2003),”
The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct (2006, background): “Similar to the linkages with the definitions theme, knowledge types and organizational structure are directly linked to the innovation and interorganizational learning themes and indirectly to the organizational learning theme (Ahuja & Katila, 2001; Dougherty, 1992; Lam, 1997; Lane & Lubatkin, 1998;”
Corporate venture capital as a means of radical innovation: Relational fit, social capital, and knowledge transfer (2007, background): “…however, too much knowledge similarity limits the positive effect of controversial discussions; the more the knowledge of the partners overlap, the less there is to learn from each other (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990; De Clercq and Sapienza, 2001; Lane and Lubatkin, 1998; Lubatkin et al., 2001).”
The Roles of Competence Trust, Formal Contract, and Time Horizon in Interorganizational Learning (2009, background): “Based on the knowledge-based view, knowledge accessing involves obtaining complementary knowledge unrelated to one’s own knowledge domain in a form of specialized knowledge (Lane and Lubatkin 1998; Lubatkin et al. 2001).”
Learning dynamics in the alliance development process (2007, background): “Lubatkin et al. (2001) draw a distinction between interfirm collaborations that involve vicarious learning, knowledge absorption learning, knowledge grafting learning, and reciprocal learning.”
Toward a learning-based view of internationalization: The accelerated trajectories of cross-border learning for latecomers (2010, background): “M&A or majority-equity JV may not be the best mode for exploration when compared to the mode of alliance (Kapoor and Lim, 2007; Lundan and Hagedoorn, 2001; Puranam and Srikanth, 2007; Wang and Zajac, 2007), especially given the double-edged effect of equity JV on learning (Li and Zhou, 2008), but…”
Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions (2009, background): “They experience similar ‘know-whats’ (the semantics and challenges of a particular information domain) and similar ‘know-hows’ (an understanding of how semantics and challenges are causally linked) (Lubatkin, Florin, and Lane, 2001).”
Inter‐firm market orientation as antecedent of knowledge transfer, innovation and value creation in networks (2011, background): “Very little is known about reciprocal learning, where the aim is not to learn what is already known by the partner but to jointly develop new knowledge and innovate (Lubatkin et al., 2001).”