Predicting school achievement from cognitive and non-cognitive variables in a Chinese sample of elementary school children

By Liping Lu, Heike S. Weber, F. Spinath, Jiannong Shi. 2011

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The present study had two aims: First, to investigate the joint and specific roles of working memory (WM) and intelligence as predictors of school achievement. And second, to replicate and extend earlier findings (Spinath, Spinath, Harlaar, & Plomin, 2006) on the incremental validity of non-cognitive over cognitive abilities in the prediction of school achievement. The present sample consisted of N = 179 Chinese primary school children in the fourth grade. All measures including working memory (WM), intelligence and motivational items were assessed in class. Teachers provided test scores for the domains of Chinese and Math. We found that WM was a good predictor of school achievement and comparable in predictive power to intelligence. Together, cognitive ability including both WM and intelligence explained 17.8% and 36.4% of the variance in children's Chinese and Math scores, respectively. The relative importance of WM and intelligence varied with school domains with greater predictive power of WM for Math while intelligence explained a greater proportion of the variance in Chinese although the magnitude of this difference was only moderate. Domain-specific motivational constructs contributed only marginally to the prediction of school achievement for both Chinese and Math. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72076d0a5bc89f888ca2c7753314d9498d96ab43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. Stefan Krumm
  2. F. Preckel
  3. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Stefan Krumm
  2. F. Preckel
  3. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich

In Statistics and Probability

  1. F. Preckel
  2. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich

Citations in the corpus