Encouraging talented girls in math and science: effects of a guidance intervention

By B. Kerr, S. Kurpius. 2004

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/703674bd2558b10e19d15a68d49738513eca50c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Thomas Goetz
2. Reinhard Pekrun
3. F. Preckel
4. N. Betz
5. Amy Guillen
6. N. Fouad
7. Nathan C. Hall
8. A. Frenzel

In Safety Research

1. N. Fouad
2. N. Betz
3. Amy Guillen
4. Thomas Goetz
5. Reinhard Pekrun
6. F. Preckel
7. Robert W. Lent
8. Steven D. Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Career Self-Efficacy: Exemplary Recent Research and Emerging Directions (2007, background): “The large majority of experimental and quasi-experimental studies have focused on increasing career decision self-efficacy (Uffelman, Subich, Diegelman, Wagner, & Bardash, 2004), with the next most common emphasis on increasing women’s self-efficacy for male-dominated career fields ( Kerr & Kurpius,”
• Gender Differences in Gifted and Average-Ability Students (2008, background): “In addition, even those females who show extraordinary scientific ability are entering the math-science pipeline less frequently than are their male counterparts (Kerr & Robinson Kurpius, 2004; Lubinski & Benbow, 1992 ).”
• Outcome Expectations: Looking to the Past and Potential Future (2006, methodology): “Although the SCCM incorporated outcome expectations as a distinct construct, many studies have focused primarily on the self-efficacy portion of the model (e.g., Kerr & Kurpius, 2004; Nauta, 2004; Quimby & O’Brien, 2004; Turner & Lapan, 2002).”