What are confidence judgments made of? Students' explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration
By Daniel L. Dinsmore, Meghan M. Parkinson. 2013
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e27ad9d8bb57f3f497a21a1fb7b6c9405af92cf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Anique B. H. de Bruin
- Tamara van Gog
- A. Efklides
- Fred Paas
- John Sweller
- Paul A. Kirschner
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Tamara van Gog
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Anique B. H. de Bruin
- Fred Paas
- M. Loon
- A. Efklides
- John Sweller
- Slava Kalyuga
Citations in the corpus
- Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students' metacognitive judgments and calibration (2013, background): “In a study examining the effect of prior knowledge on calibration, it has been found that learners reported using their prior knowledge when monitoring learning (Dinsmore & Parkinson, 2013).”
- How Does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning? An Integrative Approach (2014, background): “Dinsmore and Parkinson (2013) also showed that low ability students are less accurate in calibration (i.e., overconfident), have less skills at learning, and are less likely to know they are inaccurate and how close they are to desired learning (see also Hattie, 2013).”