The Generality-Specificity of Creativity: A Multivariate Approach.

By Todd Lubart, Jacques-Henri Guignard. 2004

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e23805c734da7c3a3006a189c8eb122cc63bedc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity (2005, background): “Acknowledging the need for a middle ground regardinggenerality-specificity and advocating a hybrid approach to designing training programs are important first steps (Amabile, 1996; Lubart & Guignard, 2004; Plucker & Beghetto, 2004).”
Creativity and Certain Personality Traits: Understanding the Mediating Effect of Intrinsic Motivation (2008, methodology): “However, self-report questionnaires and performance-based evaluations have been two of the main assessment methods used for measuring creativity (Lubart & Guignard, 2004).”
Creativity and domain specificity: The effect of task type on multiple indexes of creative problem-solving (2009, unknown): “Lubart and Guignard (2004) have suggested that in order to better understand whether creativity is domain specific or general in nature, a better understanding of tasks is needed, however, “this kind of task analysis is essentially missing in the literature and limits our ability to predict creativi”
The Contribution of Personality Traits, Motivation, Academic Risk-Taking and Metacognition to the Creative Ability in Mathematics (2015, background): “…measures (risk-taking in mathematics, self-efficacy for learning mathematics, motivation for doing mathematics, etc.) together for understanding to what extent creativity is a generalized ability, a set of domain-specific abilities, and a set of task-specific abilities (Lubart & Guignard, 2004).”
The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC (2016, background): “…nature of creativity, hybrid models and multivariate approaches have suggested that creativity resultspartly from a generalized ability, partly from a set of domain-specific abilities, and partly from a set of task-specific abilities (e.g., Lubart & Guignard, 2004; Plucker & Beghetto, 2004).”
Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, background): “Creativity is also seen as the ability to produce or design something that is original, adaptive with regard to task constraints, of high quality (Kaufman & Sternberg, 2007; Lubart & Guignard, 2004; Sternberg & Lubart, 1999), useful, beautiful and novel (Feist, 1998; Mumford, 2003; Ursyn, 2014).”
Differential Effects of Divergent Thinking, Domain Knowledge, and Interest on Creative Performance in Art and Math (2011, background): “However, the effect of a specific factor on creative performance in a given domain could change as it interacts with other factors (Amabile, 1996 ; Lubart & Guignard, 2004 ; Sternberg, 2006 ).”
Motor Creativity and Creative Thinking in Children: The Diverging Role of Inhibition (2011, background): “The on-going debate on whether creativity is a general ability applying similarly across content areas or a set of abilities tailored to specific disciplines and tasks is continuing in more recent research with considerable implications for creativity theory, assessment, and educational practices (L”