What Firms Make vs. What They Know: How Firms' Production and Knowledge Boundaries Affect Competitive Advantage in the Face of Technological Change

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions (2016, background): “There is evidence in our sample that integrated firms can both initiate and respond to architectural innovations more effectively than specialized firms (Fixson and Park, 2008; Kapoor and Adner, 2012).”
Incumbent Adaptation to Technological Change: The Past, Present, and Future of Research on Heterogeneous Incumbent Response (2018, unknown): “…is theorized to be ineffective when facing uncertainty from the possibility of technological obsolescence (Balakrishnan & Wernerfelt, 1986), Kapoor and Adner (2012) foundthatvertically integrateddynamicrandomaccess memory (DRAM) manufacturers were faster to launchanewproductgeneration…”
Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments (2013, unknown): “Mgmt. J., 34: 274–296 (2013) DOI: 10.1002/smj (Nickerson and Zenger, 2004; Teece, 1996; Kapoor and Adner, 2012).”
Understanding the Climate-knowledge Sharing Relation: The Moderating Roles of intrinsic Motivation and Job Autonomy (2016, background): “Over the last couple of decades, the argument that knowledge is the primary locus of organizations' competitive advantage has become highly influential (Davenport & Prusak, 1998; Kapoor & Adner, 2012; Zheng, Yang, & McLean, 2010).”